'What is a Good Life?'
...asks Donald Dworkin in the New York Review of Books (Issue February 10, 2011)
I wonder what I am striving for, what I am hoping to achieve in my life or with my life. I have done wrong and made mistakes and know the difference - consciousness. I have no problem admitting to making mistakes and realise with experience how much I have learned from them and how little I need to feel responsible for them as long I do learn. Doing wrong on the other hand, can have learning but a conscious decision to do wrong is very different. That is where the guilt comes.
What is guilt? Is it derived from my Catholic schooling, my parents influence, my peers or is it 'cognitive dissonance' (Festinger, 1957)? What do I do about it? I either change my belief that I am wrong or about what is wrong so I won't feel guilty. Or I find out information that might exonerate me or provide circumstances in which I might not be wrong. Or I demote the importance of the action of the wrong doing. Or I do the right thing so that my actions are in line with my beliefs. Dworkin (2011) suggests:
'...it is unlikely that we will ever achieve a full integration of our
moral, political,
and ethical values that feels authentic and right.
That is why living responsibly is a continuing project and never a
completed task.
But the wider the network of ideas we can explore,
the
further we can push that project.'
Is avoiding guilt or cognitive dissonance a good enough reason to do the right thing? Stosny (2008) advocates using the use of our sense of 'responsibilty' rather than guilt to fuel our actions, because it comes from 'basic compassion, with its inherent motivation to improve, appreciate, connect, or protect'. Dworkin (2011) considers ' we have a responsibility to live well and believe that living well means
creating a life that is not simply pleasurable but good in that
critical way.'
The consciousness I mentioned earlier which indicates the difference in my mind between making mistakes and 'doing wrong' comes across in Dworkin's (2011) explanation of why we should 'live well' (my emphasis):
We are charged to live well
by the bare fact of our existence as
self-conscious creatures with lives to lead.
We are charged in the way
we are charged by the value of anything entrusted to our care.
It is important that we live well;
not important just to us or to anyone else,
but just important.
Much in the same way that
Smith (1982) mentioned the importance of 'process' over 'product', Dworkin (2011) considers:
The final value of our lives is adverbial, not adjectival -
a matter of
how we actually lived,
not of a label applied to the final result.
So if I want to know, the 'meaning of life', perhaps I need look no further than Dworkin (2011) when he says:
'We can think of living well as giving meaning - ethical meaning,
if we want a name - to a life.'
Dworkin, R. (2011) What is a Good Life? The New York Review of Books, Issue February 10
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Smith,
M. (1980,
1982) Creators
not Consumers,
NAYC Publications /Youth Clubs UK, Second Edition
Stosny, S. (2008) Guilt vs. Responsibility is Powerlessness vs. Power, Understanding emotional pollution and power, Issue May in Anger in the Age of Entitlement, Pschyology Today
...or does the world change him instead? 
