Showing posts with label capitalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label capitalism. Show all posts

Friday, 5 June 2015

On Capitalism: Demise of Innocence


I am reminded of the slippery slope of forgetting you're identity and ideals by a post I wrote 6 years ago, about the selling off of 18% of Innocent to Coca Cola. Since then Coca Cola has taken 'full control of Innocent' (Guardian, 2013).

The post called Naughty Innocent featured the email I sent to Innocent explaining my concerns about their relationship with Coca Cola, in much the same way a mum might be concerned about the influence friends can have over their children.

On Capitalism: Coffee Costs

I am lamenting the demise of such community spaces as The Departure Lounge, now known as Husk. Just like when the brand Innocent turned to Coca Cola for investment, we see businesses, all the time, lose elements of their ideology and identity in a kind of corporate character cleansing. 

The Google blurb on Husk goes as follows:
Husk is a café & creative space in Limehouse, East London, with a heart for community, contemporary art – and really good coffee
I never went for the coffee, or the food or the contemporary art, they were all byproducts of a great community space when it was The Departure Lounge. It was a place I could go, as a youthworker with young people to chat or provide study support. It was a place I could go to write and work. It was a place I could hang out and meet friends to catch up or do the last words in the communal Guardian crossword or find out about all the interesting community activities or events going on in the vicinity or further afield. It was community.

Now, as another 'customer' remarked, the place is a 'husk' of its former self. Granted it's got air conditioning but at the cost of its warm atmosphere. Yes, there is the lovely smell of baking, but I didn't see evidence of it for sale (it just looked like another business on the premises), and the plain croissant I purchased this morning for £2.30 was either from a shop packet or was stale. Yes there are still books available to peruse, but less of them. There's no more Friday Film night, no crossword, no Unbuntu Fairtrade cola and little to no community information. No rickshaw or freebooks or graffiti out the front. No eclectic mixture of brass instruments, suitcases or a record player playing old tunes on vinyl inside, to break up the blank monotony of the New York warehouse style. 

If, as seems to be the case, Husk Coffee is trying to fall in line with the Costa's and Starbucks of this world it will have to have to do better. If it is losing so much character it needs to at least provide what it promises, starting with a better and fresher selection of food. Today breakfast options at 10.30am were limited to croissants and muffins (unless you eat gateau for breakfast) and the croissant was not fresh. Lunchtime options, again were limited (unless you eat gateau for lunch). The Meze platter was lovely, well presented, nutritious and not bad value for £4.50, however it was the only meal advertised on the cafe menu today (even though the website menu  advertises more).

Exam time, in the past, meant student groups grazing thoughout the day and having enough fuel to keep the brain ticking over. Now sadly I see people buying a cup of tea or a can and popping out to the supermarker next door for more affordable food. The price of my Americano was £2, which is the same price as Starbucks, 5p more than Costa and 10p more than Cafe Nero (Source: London Toolkit). And for that price, although the internet is provided as it is in other cafes there are not not enough plug points (as evidenced by the woman who parked her pink suitcase behind my chair and another mans chair and stood by the socket between us to use it). 

Perhaps the price is for service, because when the order is taken someone brings the coffee to the table - the personal touch? That could be argued if the system wasn't flawed. You come in the door, go to the counter and you give your order and then are asked where you are sitting. You haven't decided yet, because you thought you would get your coffee and then sit down, because it would mean having to 'baggsy' a table before coming back and paying for your coffee only so that you can go back again while someone else brings it to the table you identify - the numbered table. Yes the cookie-cutter culture of such places as Wetherspoons where being reduced to a table number rather loses the personal touch.
 
What I find particularly sad about the demise of the Departure Lounge is that it was a place which was pointed out to me by a young person I work with, who thought it would be the kind of place I'd like and the kind of place I'd bring beople. Now I'm not sure that would be the case.

If I thought the Husk cafe was a stripped down version of what it used to be, the Husk website is even more stark in comparison. It is modern, bright and has a clean slick corporate style. The advertised 'heart for community' is not apparent in its businesslike pages. The only human face to feature on the website it that of a man in the advert for the Michael Dryden and David McCulloch exhibition aptly named: 

Thursday, 4 June 2015

On Capitalism: True or False

Steve Lambert installation at 2 Degrees Festival outside Charity Shop in Tower Hamlets, London

'CAPITALISM Works for me' said the large, lit-up sign with large True and False digital counters on each side. On a podium were the words, 'In my life this is...' and underneath were True and False buttons to be pressed to vote and be counted.

Marx's “callous 'cash payment” of capitalism is why I answered 'False'.

Capitalism, much like democracy does not work for those in a power minority. The power minority are the people, whatever the number they are, who have the least power through political sway, economic leverage or strength of ability. They may be a majority in numbers but a minority when it comes to power.

A great power minority are the children of the world. The first twenty years of life may be the largest percentage in terms of being 35% of the worlds population but when you consider them in terms of strength of ability, economical or political sway, they have little power. The five year old can't vote or run for government. They can't use their spending power as a consumer or run or build business. They do not have the ability or strength to engage in the 'fight or flight' response, both figuratively and developmentally. 

According to Oxfam 'half the global wealth is held by the 1%' (Guardian, 2015). 

Another power minority, despite the great number, are the poor. And the limitations associated may as well be the same as that of a five year old. The may be able to vote but despair breeds apathy. They may be able to run for government but costs and lack of opportunities may be barriers. Lack of spending power and the inability to be able to work towards delayed gratification because the immediate situation is so pressing means little left over for anything other than survival.

And although this is written in the affluent society of one of the major cities of the Western world where we may have a higher standard of living than in other places, we still have poverty.

How can anyone say that Capitalism works when in Britain today, Tower Hamlets, a borough in East London, book-ended by the illustrious Canary Wharf and the City of London, has a child poverty rate of 49% (BBC, 2014).

Does that work for you?